Most people won't be concerned about that because they primarily use apps like Whats App and i Message for their "features", she writes, and not because of the technology they incorporate to keep messages safe.
Terrorists are using private chat apps to co-ordinate attacks and must be stopped, she writes.
- austin nichols dating sphia bush
- Webcam xxx adult public
- who has abigail breslin dating
- girlfriend denture dating
- dating com online site try
- sex dating in sims illinois
She must give the public a good idea of the risks she wants to place them under.” The Independent's bitcoin group on Facebook is the best place to follow the latest discussions and developments in cryptocurrency.
Join here for the latest on how people are making money – and how they're losing it.
End-to-end encryption works by ensuring that only the sender and recipient of a message can read it – meaning it would not be possible for tech firms to give government access to specific messages, even if they wanted to.
Ms Rudd took on that argument and said that might be true "in theory" but that "the reality is very different".
But those same apps are used by hundreds of millions of people each day, with the technology also keeping messages safe from the view of hackers and other malicious agents.
The government supports the use of strong encryption and does not want to ban end-to-end encryption, Ms Rudd says.
"“The suggestion that real people do not care about the security of their communications is dangerous and misleading," said Jim Killock, the group's executive director.
"Some people want privacy from corporations, abusive partners or employers.
But it wants a way into reading specific conversations, a plan that most experts have said is completely unworkable.