One application was a timetable of climate changes for tens of thousands of years back.
It was an anxious time for scientists whose reputation for accurate work was on the line.
But what looks like unwelcome noise to one specialist may contain information for another.
This was all the usual sort of laboratory problem-solving, a matter of sorting out difficulties by studying one or another detail systematically for months.
More unusual was the need to collaborate with all sorts of people around the world, to gather organic materials for dating.
The best way to transfer the exacting techniques was in the heads of the scientists themselves, as they moved to a new job.
Tricks also spread through visits between laboratories and at meetings, and sometimes even through publications.After a creature's death the isotope would slowly decay away over millennia at a fixed rate.Thus the less of it that remained in an object, in proportion to normal carbon, the older the object was.Also, the Sun’s own magnetic field varies with the cycle, and that could change the way cosmic particles bombarded the Earth.In 1961, Minze Stuiver suggested that longer-term solar variations might account for the inconsistent carbon-14 dates. Libby, for one, cast doubt on the idea, so subversive of the many dates his team had supposedly established with high accuracy.(9) Suess and Stuiver finally pinned down the answer in 1965 by analyzing hundreds of wood samples dated from tree rings.To get a mass large enough to handle, you needed to embed your sample in another substance, a "carrier." At first acetylene was used, but some workers ruefully noted that the gas was "never entirely free from explosion, as we know from experience."(4) Ways were found to use carbon dioxide instead.